![]() "These (girl-model) sites may be their way of getting around the law. "It's getting harder for pedophiles to function on the Internet," said Julie Posey, the director of Pedowatch. Groups such as Cyberangels and Pedowatch have picked up the slack by enlisting thousands of volunteers across the globe to scan the Internet for lurid images of children. The number of cases opened by the agency's Innocent Images National Initiative jumped 1,264 percent between 19, according to the FBI's website. The FBI, which declined to be interviewed for this story, is having a hard time keeping tabs on all the could-be child porn that is distributed over the Internet. "The girls model for each other, do each other's hair. Consider Tiffany Teen Model, where for $75, customers can purchase a this video of the 13-year-old and a friend cavorting in thong underwear. Some of the Webe Web images certainly push the arousal envelope, Aftab said. "Whatever any of these websites original intent might have been, it is pretty clear that they have been (put) up for an audience with pedophilic leanings," Sturges wrote. Sturges, reached by e-mail at a photo shoot in France, looked over the Webe Web sites and concluded that their purpose was less than innocent. Meanwhile, controversial photographer Jock Sturges continues to sell photographs of nude children despite an FBI raid, pickets by angry mobs and a grand jury investigation. It was the first such conviction dealing with this issue in which the genitals were not exposed. In a landmark 1995 case, a Pennsylvania man was sentenced to jail for possessing videotapes of young girls posing provocatively in skimpy clothing. While the law explicitly prohibits images of minors engaged in real or simulated sex, it also forbids depictions of children designed to elicit sexual arousal. "This is utterly and absolutely distasteful, and I think it would invoke child abuse, but it's probably not illegal," said Aftab. But they have been rapidly replaced by a growing number of these so-called model sites, Internet locations that offer scores of original photographs of scantily clad under-age children like Sparkle, often posed in ways requested by subscribers.The images on sites such as Lil' Amber fall into a murky legal area, said Parry Aftab, a lawyer and the director of Cyberangels, an Internet safety and education group. In recent months, an array of investigations of the child pornography business - by the Justice Department, state and local law enforcement and Congress - have contributed to wholesale shutdowns of some of the most sexually explicit Internet sites trafficking in child images. Sparkle is one of hundreds of children being photographed by adults, part of what appears to be the latest trend in online child exploitation: Web sites for pedophiles offering explicit, sexualized images of children who are covered by bits of clothing - all in the questionable hope of allowing producers, distributors and customers to avoid child pornography charges. According to the posted schedule, new photographs of her - many clearly intended to be erotic, all supposedly taken that week - are posted online every Friday for her growing legions of admirers. She has thousands of fans from around the world, membership lists show, who pay as much as $30 a month to see images of her. In just over seven months, the model has become an online phenomenon. She gazes at the viewer, her face showing a wisp of a smile that seems to have been coaxed from off-camera. ![]() Her tight panties and skimpy top are soaked and revealing. In the photograph, the model is shown rising out of a bubble bath, suds dripping from her body.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |